HomeHome
 
  • Start page
  • Statistics centre
  • Legal texts

    Legal texts

    Legal texts from the European Patent Office (EPO) in a format optimised for different screen sizes.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European Patent Convention
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Official Journal
    • EPC Guidelines
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • PCT-EPO Guidelines
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Guidelines revision cycle
    • Extension / validation system
    • London Agreement
    • National law relating to the EPC
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Unitary Patent system
    • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 

    Hand touching a tablet

    EPC now at your fingertips, on all devices

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2022 ceremony
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service

    EIA jury

    Meet the European Inventor Award jury

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Start page
  • Statistics centre
  • Legal texts
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European Patent Convention
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
          • Travaux préparatoires
          • New text
          • Transitional provisions
          • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
          • Rules relating to Fees
          • Ratifications and accessions
        • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
    • Official Journal
    • EPC Guidelines
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • PCT-EPO Guidelines
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Guidelines revision cycle
    • Extension / validation system
    • London Agreement
    • National law relating to the EPC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Unitary Patent system
    • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2022 ceremony
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Forms
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
  • Patent Index 2020
1. Taking of evidence by the departments of the EPO
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Guidelines for Examination
  4. Table of Contents
  5. Part E
  6. Chapter IV
  7. 1. Taking of evidence by the departments of the EPO
  8. 1.6 Hearing of parties, witnesses and experts
  9. 1.6.8 Hearing of a witness no longer necessary
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

1.6 Hearing of parties, witnesses and experts

Overview

1.6.8 Hearing of a witness no longer necessary 

The testimony of a witness summoned to oral proceedings is heard if the facts which the testimony is supposed to corroborate are relevant to the decision (see E‑IV, 1.2). Therefore, the witness is not heard if the facts to be proved are no longer relevant due to developments before or during oral proceedings before the witness is heard. This may be the case for example if the public availability of the relevant prior art has been proven by another means of evidence or if the patent is to be revoked on another ground for opposition and the patent proprietor submits no admissible auxiliary requests for the assessment of which the testimony would be relevant.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
Footer - More links
Footer
  • Terms of use
  • Legal notice
  • Data protection and privacy