HomeHome
 
  • Start page
  • Statistics centre
  • Legal texts

    Legal texts

    Legal texts from the European Patent Office (EPO) in a format optimised for different screen sizes.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European Patent Convention
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Official Journal
    • EPC Guidelines
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • PCT-EPO Guidelines
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Guidelines revision cycle
    • Extension / validation system
    • London Agreement
    • National law relating to the EPC
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Unitary Patent system
    • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 

    Hand touching a tablet

    EPC now at your fingertips, on all devices

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2022 ceremony
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service

    EIA jury

    Meet the European Inventor Award jury

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Start page
  • Statistics centre
  • Legal texts
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European Patent Convention
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
          • Travaux préparatoires
          • New text
          • Transitional provisions
          • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
          • Rules relating to Fees
          • Ratifications and accessions
        • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
    • Official Journal
    • EPC Guidelines
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • PCT-EPO Guidelines
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Guidelines revision cycle
    • Extension / validation system
    • London Agreement
    • National law relating to the EPC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Unitary Patent system
    • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2022 ceremony
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Forms
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
  • Patent Index 2020
2. Late-filed submissions
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Guidelines for Examination
  4. Table of Contents
  5. Part E
  6. Chapter VI
  7. 2. Late-filed submissions
  8. 2.2 Submissions filed in preparation for or during oral proceedings
  9. 2.2.4 Right to be heard
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

2.2 Submissions filed in preparation for or during oral proceedings

Overview

2.2.4 Right to be heard 

Generally, the parties must be heard before the division decides on whether or not to admit late-filed submissions.

For instance, if the opponent introduces a new ground for opposition during oral proceedings, they must always be granted the right to be heard, even where the arguments concern a late-filed ground for opposition and new arguments and evidence related to it. This means that the division must give the parties the opportunity to put forward arguments and duly consider them before deciding on the admissibility of the new ground. Similarly, where the opponent files pertinent new material, the patent proprietor must be given a chance to present comments and submit amendments. If the opposition division approves the introduction of new facts or evidence and if the other parties have not had sufficient time to study them, it grants, where easily comprehensible subject-matter is involved, the parties an opportunity to familiarise themselves with it, possibly by briefly interrupting the oral proceedings. If this is not feasible, the other parties must, upon request, be given the opportunity to comment in the proceedings subsequent to the oral proceedings, where appropriate in a further set of oral proceedings. Where possible, however, oral proceedings will not be adjourned.

Where possible, legal commentaries, decisions (of a board of appeal, for example) and reports on legal decisions which are to be referred to in oral proceedings must be notified to the opposition division and the other parties in good time before the proceedings. They may, however, be quoted or submitted for the first time in the oral proceedings themselves if the opposition division agrees after consulting the parties.

The reasons for the decision on the admissibility of late-filed facts, evidence and requests have to be provided in the written decision and must not come as a surprise. A mere reference to the division's discretionary power is not sufficient (E‑X, 2.10). In examination proceedings, reasons only need to be provided if the late-filed facts, evidence or requests are not admitted.

Art. 113(1)

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
Footer - More links
Footer
  • Terms of use
  • Legal notice
  • Data protection and privacy