| The participants at the 17th European Patent Judges' Symposium | 1-3 | PDF | HTML |
| OPENING OF THE SYMPOSIUM AND WELCOMING ADDRESSES |
| Ants KULL | 4-7 | PDF | HTML |
| Wim VAN DER EIJK | 8-23 | PDF | HTML |
| REPORT ON PROCEEDINGS |
| Stefan LUGINBÜHL | 24-41 | PDF | HTML |
| WORKING SESSION |
| The Unified Patent Court |
| Carl JOSEFSSON Preselection and training of UPC judges | 42-45 | PDF | HTML |
| Sir David KITCHIN Development of a common judicial culture and judgecraft among the judges of the UPC | 46-60 | PDF | HTML |
| Sir Richard ARNOLD A patent held in a binding ruling to have been infringed is subsequently revoked: what happens next? National practice and what will the UPC do? | 61-68 | PDF | HTML |
| Marie COURBOULAY Different practices at national courts: a challenge for the UPC | 69-72 | PDF | HTML |
| William CHANDLER Patentability of computer-implemented inventions (CIIs): state of play and developments | 73-79 | PDF | HTML |
| Klaus GRABINSKI Comparison and interaction between EPO boards of appeal and national courts – state of play in German practice | 80-95 | PDF | HTML |
| Latest case law concerning supplementary protection certificates |
| İlhami GÜNEŞ Supplementary protection certificates in EU law: a compensation mechanism and Turkey's position | 96-104 | PDF | HTML |
| Massimo SCUFFI Supplementary protection certificates: the evolution of European case law on the terms of patent extension and the scope of protection | 105-119 | PDF | HTML |
| Rian KALDEN Discussion of recent CJEU case law on SPCs: the three 12 December 2013 cases | 120-134 | PDF | HTML |
| What amendments are permissible in order to be in line with the requirements under Article 123(2) and (3) EPC? |
| Fritz BLUMER What amendments are permissible in order to be in line with the requirements under Article 123(2) and (3) EPC? | 135-144 | PDF | HTML |
| Klaus BACHER What amendments are admissible under Article 123(2) and (3) EPC? | 145-157 | PDF | HTML |
| NATIONAL JUDGES' PRESENTATIONS |
| Recent developments in European and national patent law and case law |
| CH Switzerland Dieter BRÄNDLE | 158-166 | PDF | HTML |
| DK Denmark Hans Christian THOMSEN | 167-169 | PDF | HTML |
| EPO European Patent Office Yvonne PODBIELSKI | 170-176 | PDF | HTML |
| FR France Sophie DARBOIS | 177-198 | PDF | HTML |
| GB United Kingdom Richard HACON | 199-210 | PDF | HTML |
| IT Italy Gabriella MUSCOLO | 211-222 | PDF | HTML |
| NL Netherlands Edger BRINKMAN | 223-228 | PDF | HTML |
| RO Romania Andreia Liana CONSTANDA | 229-243 | PDF | HTML |
| SE Sweden Peter STRÖMBERG | 244-246 | PDF | HTML |
| LIST OF PARTICIPANTS |
| LIST OF PARTICIPANTS | 247-250 | PDF | HTML |
| ANNEX |
| Case study "Extractor hood" |
| Case study Contents | 251 | PDF | HTML |
| Introduction – Case study: "Extractor hood" Dieter BRÄNDLE | 252-253 | PDF | HTML |
| 1. Presentation of the case study | 254-255 | PDF | HTML |
| 2. Statement of claim | 256-274 | PDF | HTML |
| 3. Defence | 275-300 | PDF | HTML |
| 4. Patent in suit – English translation of EP 1 234 567 B1 | 301-310 | PDF | HTML |
| 5. Citation – English translation of EP 1 134 501 A1 | 311-325 | PDF | HTML |
| 6. Questions | 326 | PDF | HTML |
| 7. Patent legislation | 327-338 | PDF | HTML |
