C. Ausreichende Offenbarung
Overview
C. Ausreichende Offenbarung
3.Für die Beurteilung der ausreichenden Offenbarung maßgebende Teile der Anmeldung
4.Für die Beurteilung der ausreichenden Offenbarung maßgebendes Wissen des Fachmanns
5.Deutlichkeit und Vollständigkeit der Offenbarung
6.Ausführbarkeit
7.Das Erfordernis der ausreichenden Offenbarung auf dem Gebiet der Biotechnologie
8.Das Verhältnis zwischen Artikel 83 und Artikel 84 EPÜ
9.Beweisfragen
- T 424/21
Catchword:
1. If the deletion of dependent claims after notification of a summons to oral proceedings enhances procedural economy by clearly overcoming existing objections without giving rise to any new issues this might constitute cogent reasons justifying exceptional circumstances in the sense of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020.
2. For a first medical use of a substance or composition according to Article 54(4) EPC to be sufficiently disclosed it is not required to show the suitability for each and every disease, but it usually suffices to show that at least one medical use is credibly achieved.
- T 500/20
Catchword:
Reasons 3.6. In claimed inventions that do not involve a range of parameter values or compositions but are directed at a concept expressed in terms of generic structural or functional features of an apparatus or of a method, it is not enough to demonstrate insufficiency to conceive of an example that falls within the terms of the claim that does not work because it does not achieve the claimed effect fully or at all so that therefore the invention would not be sufficiently disclosed across the entire breadth of the claim.